Blog

The Acquisition That Looked Clean Until It Wasn’t

A target company passes legal due diligence. The financial statements are in order. The registry shows no adverse ownership. The deal closes. Integration begins.

Then something surfaces.

This is not a rare occurrence in African Mergers & Acquisition. It is a pattern consistent enough to warrant its own category of attention, and one that carries consequences that range from the commercially inconvenient to the operationally catastrophic.

The liability that surfaces may have been structured specifically to avoid detection before closing. A holding entity registered in a different jurisdiction, carrying obligations that do not appear on the target’s balance sheet. A government relationship that existed throughout the transaction process but was never disclosed, and is now a regulatory problem that the acquirer has inherited along with everything else. An ownership interest held through a nominee or a trust structure that no document in the disclosure process was ever going to reveal, because it was never in any document.

Legal due diligence is a disclosure exercise. It assesses what the target presents, what is filed, what is submitted and what the vendor’s advisers include in the data room. It is not designed to find what has been deliberately kept outside that process and in African markets, the gap between the two can be considerable.

Ownership structures in African markets are routinely layered across multiple jurisdictions. Public registry information is frequently incomplete, outdated or simply absent for certain categories of interest. Relationships between a target entity and government officials, politically connected individuals, or undisclosed beneficial owners are rarely captured in any filing and are not the kind of information that surfaces through a document review, however thorough.

Finding it requires a different kind of exercise. Not a review of what has been disclosed, but an independent assessment of what the target actually carries, conducted through sources that exist outside the transaction process itself. Local networks. Market intelligence. Conversations with people who know the target, the sector, and the jurisdiction well enough to identify what is conspicuously absent from the picture being presented.

In African markets, closing is not the end of due diligence. It is often where the real findings begin. The acquirers best positioned to avoid that experience are the ones who treated pre-closing intelligence as a parallel process to legal due diligence, not a substitute for it and not an afterthought.